I have been repeatedly and formally asking Judge MACASKILL for the transcript. He has formally refused to give it to me despite the other party having no objections to my having it. Will try again today with even more material reasons and yes as the Plaintiff I would like to have it read it and maybe take advice to consider where to go next
I would like to thank the the 7 people who have donated so far to my Givealittle page as I have settled yesterday
Have had an email from one of the three Institutes but not my own, AMINZ, disappointingly and sadly. Too late to be of any use in the District Court matter but dont know why they just all didn’t jump in to the District Court or at least try. It is their words in the Short Form of Consultant Agreement I was seeking to be held to and not held to be of little to no worth . More to follow
Givealittle donation link Please Please Help https://givealittle.co.nz/cause/lawpoliticsjusticeearthquakeninsurancevictimsaminz?_ga=2.183574246.1155523259.1506222287-1452377448.1505530931#
This recent Court decision has ramifications for Mediations, which include three professional bodies, AMINZ, IPENZ, ACENZ.
I need the Court “transcript” urgently from Judge MACASKILL of the District Court, who ensured the Court was cleared before the hearing. The Judge announced formally that I have insufficient reasons for wanting it made available to me. What do you think after reading below?
To Canterbury, Wellington and Kaikoura earthquake event victims,
Clause 18 of the “Short Form Agreement for Consultant Engagement” “The Parties shall attempt in good faith to settle any dispute by mediation.” What does “shall” mean legally?
Do you think a Member of Parliament should help the Judicial process or not? I want pages “2” “3” “4” “5” & “6” from the Discovery process
The judge has got this wrong and wouldn’t allow my own professional body, the Arbitrators and Mediators Institute to intervene.
In my opinion, by not releasing the transcript the Judge has stopped me from putting it on my blog or Facebook and has interfered with this week’s election process.
No “discourse” from the supposed social consciences of NZ society being the University of Otago Faculties of Law or Politics? Royal Commission inquiry into the current restriction in place by the Faculties of Law at the Universities has restricted the number of graduates, therefore the restriction is the principal reason why ‘access to justice’ is denied to the citizens of this nation. The Minister has been formally asked to commence this Royal Commission. “Justice delayed is justice denied ”
My lawyer is suspended
I have had an email “authorised” by the party concerned warning me to be careful as to what I say or they mighty seek a “remedy”
Please donate and watch what happens as I have clean hands
Election Officers Donna, Kyla President Hugh et al,
This is what really happens during an OUSA election at the University of Otago.
One. I get an email from the Proctor Dave Scott whom says he wants to call upon his office. I ask by email what for. He says by email he doesnt want to discuss the matter by email. I say by email do I need to bring a lawyer and is the matter criminal or civil? He says by email neither?? (Didnt now there were other kinds till now) So I ask OUSA to attend who say they cant as I am a candidate unless I get permission. So I goes to the Proctors office and he is not available. So I goes to OUSA whom are out. So I goes back to the Proctor myself and he interrogates me for almost ten minutes but refuses to say what he wants to see me for at all. I explained to him that he was the one who asked me to come and he was the one who wouldnt put wouldn’t put pen to paper and after being cross examined for almost ten minutes I still was really none the wiser as to why I was there . I tells him he is bound by the Official Information Act and by not coming out with the truth at this time he would have to be answerable to an Act of Parliament and additionally risked bringing the name of the University of Otago into disrepute both here and internationally. Still he wouldn’t tell me what I was sequestered for. So the application under the Official Information Act 1982 is now in the office off Chancellor John Gray
Two. As all the candidates know I found a sponsor to put $200 for an after the election results were announced social gathering with a few beers and some grub.
The money was duly delivered a long time ago to the OUSA CEO Deborah in cash. Now I get an email just now saying they have done nothing whatsoever and it is up to me to do it What is wrong with a small celebration at the end of a hard fought campaign Chance to congratulate the winners and thank those who got less than first? Other Universities have such similar events annually. I dont even know where the money has gone to now ???????? Where does on get a Liquor licence in less than 60 minutes – Online?
Three. Next I am told just now the OUSA will not allow scrutineers to ensure the vote count is open and transparent as it should be in a truly democratic country like New Zealand.
Four. I have been to the Faculty of Law previously to seek some Constitutional advice but the shutters went up faster than you can say “Jack Robinson”
Five. I went to Critic to ask them to cover the defection of one of the Unity Party members but they told me that they couldnt talk to me, I had best leave the building, would not be covering the defection and hence have become an advocate for the Unity’s party and hence have influenced the outcome of the election. This despite the statement of the Returning officer team
“Critic has full media independence”
Welcome to the University of Otago where the motto states “Dare to be wise”
Vice Presidential Candidate OUSA Elections 2017
Gordon J Dickson, Assoc. AMINZ,Student #4860640
Today is “Fathers Day” and to all you every second, third, fourth weekend and worse off access wise fathers keep in touch with your children Do not forget birthdays and Christmas either please. Seems highly likely you can get school reports to. I did but by accident initially Kia kaha
The family court decisions need reviewing and analysing so we can see if the aim of the children being placed first is true or false
Anyone seeing candidates Bill English, Jacinda Adern, James Shaw, Winston Peters, David Seymour, Te Ururoa Flavell, Gareth Morgan, Hone Harawira etc ask them for their Party’s policy please and post it?